f10q_103113.htm
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission file number 001-33749
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)
Delaware (Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
26-0500600 (Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)
27-1532741 (Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
8905 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 108
San Diego, California
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
92122
(Zip code)
|
(858) 677-0900
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
Yes [x] No [ ]
|
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
|
Yes [x] No [ ]
|
(Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP became subject to filing requirements under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, upon effectiveness of its Registration Statement on Form S-3 on June 3, 2013 and has filed all required reports subsequent to that date.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
Yes [x] No [ ]
|
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
|
Yes [x] No [ ]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated filer [x]
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company [ ]
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated filer [x]
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company [ ]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
Yes [ ] No [x]
|
|
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
|
Yes [ ] No [x]
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 72,062,585 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding as of October 28, 2013.
EXPLANATORY PARAGRAPH
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation (“ROIC”), and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) of which Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. is the parent company and general partner. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company” refer to ROIC together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to the Operating Partnership refer to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
ROIC operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and as of September 30, 2013, ROIC owned an approximate 95.6% partnership interest and other limited partners owned the remaining 4.4% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, ROIC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and as the parent company, ROIC has the full and complete authority over the operating partnership’s day-to-day management and control.
The Company believes that combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of ROIC and the Operating Partnership into a single report will result in the following benefits:
|
·
|
facilitate a better understanding by the investors of ROIC and the Operating Partnership by enabling them to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business
|
|
·
|
remove duplicative disclosures and provide a more straightforward presentation in light of the fact that a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both ROIC and the Operating Partnership; and
|
|
·
|
create time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
|
Management operates ROIC and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of ROIC and the Operating Partnership are the same.
There are few differences between ROIC and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosures in this report. The Company believes it is important to understand the differences between ROIC and the Operating Partnership in the context of how these entities operate as an interrelated consolidated company. ROIC is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of direct or indirect partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and membership interest in Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As a result, ROIC does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the parent company of the Operating Partnership and issuing equity from time to time. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and directly or indirectly holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from warrant exercises and equity issuances by ROIC, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s incurrence of indebtedness (directly and through subsidiaries) or through the issuance of operating partnership units (“OP Units”) of the Operating Partnership.
Noncontrolling interests is the primary area of difference between the Consolidated Financial Statements for ROIC and the Operating Partnership. The OP Units in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by ROIC are accounted for as partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in ROIC’s financial statements. Accordingly, this report presents the Consolidated Financial Statements for ROIC and the Operating Partnership separately, as required, as well as Earnings Per Share / Earnings Per Unit and Capital of the Partnership.
This report also includes separate Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources, Item 4. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications for each of ROIC and the Operating Partnership as reflected in Exhibits 31 and 32.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
September 30, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
374,112,312 |
|
|
$ |
283,445,257 |
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
886,635,954 |
|
|
|
588,248,338 |
|
|
|
|
1,260,748,266 |
|
|
|
871,693,595 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
49,725,821 |
|
|
|
32,364,772 |
|
|
|
|
1,211,022,445 |
|
|
|
839,328,823 |
|
Mortgage note receivable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,295,223 |
|
Real Estate Investments, net
|
|
|
1,211,022,445 |
|
|
|
864,624,046 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,834,336 |
|
|
|
4,692,230 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,977,552 |
|
|
|
1,700,692 |
|
Tenant and other receivables, net
|
|
|
16,665,091 |
|
|
|
12,455,190 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Acquired lease intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
44,206,512 |
|
|
|
41,230,616 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
523,510 |
|
|
|
1,245,778 |
|
Deferred charges, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
24,963,685 |
|
|
|
21,623,474 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,417,373 |
|
|
|
1,339,501 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,312,610,504 |
|
|
$ |
950,911,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$ |
200,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000,000 |
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
174,750,000 |
|
|
|
119,000,000 |
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
126,910,642 |
|
|
|
72,689,842 |
|
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
58,436,655 |
|
|
|
57,371,803 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,273,033 |
|
|
|
6,468,580 |
|
Tenants' security deposits
|
|
|
3,242,511 |
|
|
|
2,336,680 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16,580,673 |
|
|
|
26,502,551 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
593,193,514 |
|
|
|
484,369,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value 500,000,000 shares authorized; and 72,062,585 and 52,596,754 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
738,388,691 |
|
|
|
523,540,268 |
|
Dividends in excess of earnings
|
|
|
(40,496,143 |
) |
|
|
(38,851,234 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(9,953,654 |
) |
|
|
(18,154,612 |
) |
Total Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. stockholders' equity
|
|
|
687,946,094 |
|
|
|
466,539,682 |
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
31,470,896 |
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
Total equity
|
|
|
719,416,990 |
|
|
|
466,542,071 |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
1,312,610,504 |
|
|
$ |
950,911,527 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rents
|
|
$ |
20,686,688 |
|
|
$ |
15,196,646 |
|
|
$ |
60,197,590 |
|
|
$ |
42,734,688 |
|
Recoveries from tenants
|
|
|
5,330,339 |
|
|
|
3,343,541 |
|
|
|
15,549,716 |
|
|
|
9,427,763 |
|
Mortgage interest
|
|
|
204,961 |
|
|
|
189,995 |
|
|
|
617,217 |
|
|
|
901,645 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
925,454 |
|
|
|
159,092 |
|
|
|
1,229,575 |
|
|
|
591,234 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
27,147,442 |
|
|
|
18,889,274 |
|
|
|
77,594,098 |
|
|
|
53,655,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
|
|
4,963,809 |
|
|
|
3,072,670 |
|
|
|
13,204,316 |
|
|
|
9,324,140 |
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
2,795,468 |
|
|
|
1,781,639 |
|
|
|
7,893,452 |
|
|
|
5,115,361 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,755,321 |
|
|
|
7,070,557 |
|
|
|
27,813,157 |
|
|
|
20,737,917 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,526,312 |
|
|
|
3,699,852 |
|
|
|
8,175,994 |
|
|
|
8,716,378 |
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
641,224 |
|
|
|
194,191 |
|
|
|
1,569,592 |
|
|
|
947,404 |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
20,682,134 |
|
|
|
15,818,909 |
|
|
|
58,656,511 |
|
|
|
44,841,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,465,308 |
|
|
|
3,070,365 |
|
|
|
18,937,587 |
|
|
|
8,814,130 |
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other finance expenses
|
|
|
(3,703,556 |
) |
|
|
(3,094,023 |
) |
|
|
(10,974,103 |
) |
|
|
(8,144,879 |
) |
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
|
|
|
20,381,849 |
|
|
|
2,144,696 |
|
|
|
20,381,849 |
|
|
|
2,144,696 |
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,864,145 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
2,118,501 |
|
|
|
497,311 |
|
|
|
2,389,937 |
|
|
|
1,481,132 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
11,280 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
25,262,291 |
|
|
|
2,618,768 |
|
|
|
30,736,718 |
|
|
|
8,170,504 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(713,529 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net Income Attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on swap derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized swap derivative (loss) gain arising during the period
|
|
|
(1,419,472 |
) |
|
|
(2,823,453 |
) |
|
|
4,642,590 |
|
|
|
(7,873,977 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net income
|
|
|
1,187,866 |
|
|
|
1,184,484 |
|
|
|
3,558,368 |
|
|
|
2,720,594 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on swap derivative, net
|
|
|
(231,606 |
) |
|
|
(1,638,969 |
) |
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
|
|
(5,153,383 |
) |
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
25,030,685 |
|
|
$ |
979,799 |
|
|
$ |
38,224,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,017,121 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statement of Equity
(unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
Dividends in
Excess of
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
52,596,754 |
|
|
$ |
5,260 |
|
|
$ |
523,540,268 |
|
|
$ |
(38,851,234 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,154,612 |
) |
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
466,542,071 |
|
Shares issued under the 2009 Plan
|
|
|
233,914 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(280,972 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(280,974 |
) |
Retirement of options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(274,830 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(274,830 |
) |
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants
|
|
|
18,565,282 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
222,781,527 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
222,783,378 |
|
Exercise of Sponsor warrants
|
|
|
688,500 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Buyback of warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(23,318,841 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(23,318,841 |
) |
Issuance of OP Units to Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,372,731 |
|
|
|
45,372,731 |
|
Adjustment to for Non-controlling interests ownership in Operating Partnership
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,901,835 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13,901,835 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Purchase of Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
Registration expenditures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69,245 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69,245 |
) |
Dividends ($.45 per share)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(31,585,598 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(31,585,598 |
) |
Dividends payable on performance-based shares
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(82,500 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(82,500 |
) |
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,023,189 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,023,189 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
Balance at September 30, 2013
|
|
|
72,062,585 |
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
$ |
738,388,691 |
|
|
$ |
(40,496,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,953,654 |
) |
|
$ |
31,470,896 |
|
|
$ |
719,416,990 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27,813,157 |
|
|
|
20,737,917 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and mortgage premiums, net
|
|
|
101,572 |
|
|
|
346,685 |
|
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
|
|
|
(20,381,849 |
) |
|
|
(2,144,696 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,864,145 |
) |
Straight-line rent adjustment
|
|
|
(2,336,767 |
) |
|
|
(2,504,416 |
) |
Amortization of above and below market rent
|
|
|
(3,044,768 |
) |
|
|
(2,569,807 |
) |
Amortization relating to stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
|
|
2,298,971 |
|
Provisions for tenant credit losses
|
|
|
961,051 |
|
|
|
759,857 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(2,389,937 |
) |
|
|
(1,481,131 |
) |
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
713,529 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Distribution of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
686,017 |
|
Other
|
|
|
490,924 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(353,354 |
) |
|
|
(473,465 |
) |
Tenant and other receivables
|
|
|
(1,832,325 |
) |
|
|
(2,299,437 |
) |
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
742,972 |
|
|
|
86,983 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,725,392 |
|
|
|
253,885 |
|
Other assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(1,998,197 |
) |
|
|
1,192,822 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
33,343,629 |
|
|
|
19,196,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate
|
|
|
(180,090,191 |
) |
|
|
(125,743,992 |
) |
Acquisition of entities
|
|
|
(43,378,106 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate
|
|
|
5,607,612 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investments in mortgage notes receivables
|
|
|
(294,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(735,000 |
) |
Return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,661,211 |
|
Improvements to properties
|
|
|
(14,629,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,478,170 |
) |
Deposits on real estate acquisitions
|
|
|
(7,150,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,600,000 |
) |
Construction escrows and other
|
|
|
76,494 |
|
|
|
(207,290 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(239,857,327 |
) |
|
|
(126,103,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on mortgages
|
|
|
(7,663,760 |
) |
|
|
(7,608,484 |
) |
Proceeds from draws on term loan/credit facility
|
|
|
251,750,000 |
|
|
|
90,000,000 |
|
Payments on credit facility
|
|
|
(196,000,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Payment of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(1,864,370 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
222,783,378 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Payments to acquire warrants
|
|
|
(23,318,841 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from the sale of stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
36,860,055 |
|
Purchase of Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Deferred financing and other costs
|
|
|
(1,817,567 |
) |
|
|
(2,612,648 |
) |
Registration expenditures
|
|
|
(69,245 |
) |
|
|
(821,781 |
) |
Dividends paid to common shareholders
|
|
|
(31,585,598 |
) |
|
|
(19,739,210 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(280,974 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Retirement of options
|
|
|
(274,830 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
211,655,804 |
|
|
|
96,077,932 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,142,106 |
|
|
|
(10,828,765 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
4,692,230 |
|
|
|
34,317,588 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
9,834,336 |
|
|
$ |
23,488,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of OP Units in connection with acquisitions of entities
|
|
$ |
45,372,731 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Assumed mortgage at fair value
|
|
$ |
62,749,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,428,062 |
|
Intangible lease liabilities
|
|
$ |
6,444,176 |
|
|
$ |
9,660,574 |
|
Transfer of equity investment in property to real estate investment
|
|
$ |
15,990,769 |
|
|
$ |
4,008,350 |
|
Interest rate swap asset
|
|
$ |
1,391,684 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Interest rate swap liabilities
|
|
$ |
(6,665,724 |
) |
|
$ |
5,252,199 |
|
Accrued real estate improvement costs
|
|
$ |
721,259 |
|
|
$ |
308,771 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
374,112,312 |
|
|
$ |
283,445,257 |
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
886,635,954 |
|
|
|
588,248,338 |
|
|
|
|
1,260,748,266 |
|
|
|
871,693,595 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
49,725,821 |
|
|
|
32,364,772 |
|
|
|
|
1,211,022,445 |
|
|
|
839,328,823 |
|
Mortgage note receivable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,295,223 |
|
Real Estate Investments, net
|
|
|
1,211,022,445 |
|
|
|
864,624,046 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,834,336 |
|
|
|
4,692,230 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,977,552 |
|
|
|
1,700,692 |
|
Tenant and other receivables, net
|
|
|
16,665,091 |
|
|
|
12,455,190 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Acquired lease intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
44,206,512 |
|
|
|
41,230,616 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
523,510 |
|
|
|
1,245,778 |
|
Deferred charges, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
24,963,685 |
|
|
|
21,623,474 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,417,373 |
|
|
|
1,339,501 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,312,610,504 |
|
|
$ |
950,911,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$ |
200,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000,000 |
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
174,750,000 |
|
|
|
119,000,000 |
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
126,910,642 |
|
|
|
72,689,842 |
|
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
58,436,655 |
|
|
|
57,371,803 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,273,033 |
|
|
|
6,468,580 |
|
Tenants' security deposits
|
|
|
3,242,511 |
|
|
|
2,336,680 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16,580,673 |
|
|
|
26,502,551 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
593,193,154 |
|
|
|
484,369,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners’ Capital, Unlimited partnership units authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROIC capital (consists of general and limited partnership interests held by ROIC)
|
|
|
697,899,748 |
|
|
|
484,694,294 |
|
Limited partners’ capital (consists of limited partnership interests held by third parties)
|
|
|
31,470,896 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(9,953,654 |
) |
|
|
(18,154,612 |
) |
Total partners’ capital
|
|
|
719,416,990 |
|
|
|
466,539,682 |
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
Total capital
|
|
|
719,416,990 |
|
|
|
466,542,071 |
|
Total liabilities and capital
|
|
$ |
1,312,610,504 |
|
|
$ |
950,911,527 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rents
|
|
$ |
20,686,688 |
|
|
$ |
15,196,646 |
|
|
$ |
60,197,590 |
|
|
$ |
42,734,688 |
|
Recoveries from tenants
|
|
|
5,330,339 |
|
|
|
3,343,541 |
|
|
|
15,549,716 |
|
|
|
9,427,763 |
|
Mortgage interest
|
|
|
204,961 |
|
|
|
189,995 |
|
|
|
617,217 |
|
|
|
901,645 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
925,454 |
|
|
|
159,092 |
|
|
|
1,229,575 |
|
|
|
591,234 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
27,147,442 |
|
|
|
18,889,274 |
|
|
|
77,594,098 |
|
|
|
53,655,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
|
|
4,963,809 |
|
|
|
3,072,670 |
|
|
|
13,204,316 |
|
|
|
9,324,140 |
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
2,795,468 |
|
|
|
1,781,639 |
|
|
|
7,893,452 |
|
|
|
5,115,361 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,755,321 |
|
|
|
7,070,557 |
|
|
|
27,813,157 |
|
|
|
20,737,917 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,526,312 |
|
|
|
3,699,852 |
|
|
|
8,175,994 |
|
|
|
8,716,378 |
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
641,224 |
|
|
|
194,191 |
|
|
|
1,569,592 |
|
|
|
947,404 |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
20,682,134 |
|
|
|
15,818,909 |
|
|
|
58,656,511 |
|
|
|
44,841,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,465,308 |
|
|
|
3,070,365 |
|
|
|
18,937,587 |
|
|
|
8,814,130 |
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other finance expenses
|
|
|
(3,703,556 |
) |
|
|
(3,094,023 |
) |
|
|
(10,974,103 |
) |
|
|
(8,144,879 |
) |
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
|
|
|
20,381,849 |
|
|
|
2,144,696 |
|
|
|
20,381,849 |
|
|
|
2,144,696 |
|
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,864,145 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
2,118,501 |
|
|
|
497,311 |
|
|
|
2,389,937 |
|
|
|
1,481,132 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
11,280 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
25,262,291 |
|
|
|
2,618,768 |
|
|
|
30,736,718 |
|
|
|
8,170,504 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(713,529 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net Income Attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit - basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net income per unit (1)
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit - diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net income per unit
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per unit
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP.
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on swap derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized swap derivative (loss) gain arising during the period
|
|
|
(1,419,472 |
) |
|
|
(2,823,453 |
) |
|
|
4,642,590 |
|
|
|
(7,873,977 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net income
|
|
|
1,187,866 |
|
|
|
1,184,484 |
|
|
|
3,558,368 |
|
|
|
2,720,594 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on swap derivative, net
|
|
|
(231,606 |
) |
|
|
(1,638,969 |
) |
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
|
|
(5,153,383 |
) |
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
25,030,685 |
|
|
$ |
979,799 |
|
|
$ |
38,224,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,017,121 |
|
____________________
(1)
|
Earnings per share may not add due to rounding.
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statement of Capital
(unaudited)
|
|
Limited Partner’s Capital (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
52,596,754 |
|
|
$ |
484,694,294 |
|
|
$ |
(18,154,612 |
) |
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
466,542,071 |
|
Distributions to ROIC
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,865 |
) |
|
|
(55,611,988 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(55,611,988 |
) |
Contributions from ROIC
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19,487,696 |
|
|
|
222,783,378 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
222,783,378 |
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
Issuance of OP Units to Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
3,290,263 |
|
|
|
45,372,731 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,372,731 |
|
Adjustment to Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13,901,835 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,901,835 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Purchase of Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,023,189 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,023,189 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,200,958 |
|
Balance at September 30, 2013
|
|
|
3,290,263 |
|
|
$ |
31,470,896 |
|
|
|
72,062,585 |
|
|
$ |
697,899,748 |
|
|
$ |
(9,953,654 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
719,416,990 |
|
____________________
(1)
|
Consists of limited partnership interests held by third parties.
|
(2)
|
Consists of general and limited partnership interests held by ROIC.
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27,813,157 |
|
|
|
20,737,917 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and mortgage premiums, net
|
|
|
101,572 |
|
|
|
346,685 |
|
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
|
|
|
(20,381,849 |
) |
|
|
(2,144,696 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,864,145 |
) |
Straight-line rent adjustment
|
|
|
(2,336,767 |
) |
|
|
(2,504,416 |
) |
Amortization of above and below market rent
|
|
|
(3,044,768 |
) |
|
|
(2,569,807 |
) |
Amortization relating to stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,109,040 |
|
|
|
2,298,971 |
|
Provisions for tenant credit losses
|
|
|
961,051 |
|
|
|
759,857 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(2,389,937 |
) |
|
|
(1,481,131 |
) |
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
713,529 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Distribution of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
686,017 |
|
Other
|
|
|
490,924 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(353,354 |
) |
|
|
(473,465 |
) |
Tenant and other receivables
|
|
|
(1,832,325 |
) |
|
|
(2,299,437 |
) |
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
742,972 |
|
|
|
86,983 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,725,392 |
|
|
|
253,885 |
|
Other assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(1,998,197 |
) |
|
|
1,192,822 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
33,343,629 |
|
|
|
19,196,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate
|
|
|
(180,090,191 |
) |
|
|
(125,743,992 |
) |
Acquisition of entities
|
|
|
(43,378,106 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate
|
|
|
5,607,612 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investments in mortgage notes receivables
|
|
|
(294,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(735,000 |
) |
Return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,661,211 |
|
Improvements to properties
|
|
|
(14,629,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,478,170 |
) |
Deposits on real estate acquisitions
|
|
|
(7,150,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,600,000 |
) |
Construction escrows and other
|
|
|
76,494 |
|
|
|
(207,290 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(239,857,327 |
) |
|
|
(126,103,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on mortgages
|
|
|
(7,663,760 |
) |
|
|
(7,608,484 |
) |
Proceeds from draws on term loan/credit facility
|
|
|
251,750,000 |
|
|
|
90,000,000 |
|
Payments on credit facility
|
|
|
(196,000,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Payment of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(1,864,370 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Deferred financing and other costs
|
|
|
(1,817,567 |
) |
|
|
(2,612,648 |
) |
Distributions to ROIC
|
|
|
(55,529,488 |
) |
|
|
(20,560,991 |
) |
Contributions from ROIC
|
|
|
222,783,378 |
|
|
|
36,860,055 |
|
Purchase of Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
211,655,804 |
|
|
|
96,077,932 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,142,106 |
|
|
|
(10,828,765 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
4,692,230 |
|
|
|
34,317,588 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
9,834,336 |
|
|
$ |
23,488,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of OP Units in connection with acquisitions of entities
|
|
$ |
45,372,731 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Assumed mortgage at fair value
|
|
$ |
62,749,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,428,062 |
|
Intangible lease liabilities
|
|
$ |
6,444,176 |
|
|
$ |
9,660,574 |
|
Transfer of equity investment in property to real estate investment
|
|
$ |
15,990,769 |
|
|
$ |
4,008,350 |
|
Interest rate swap asset
|
|
$ |
1,391,684 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Interest rate swap liabilities
|
|
$ |
(6,665,724 |
) |
|
$ |
5,252,199 |
|
Accrued real estate improvement costs
|
|
$ |
721,259 |
|
|
$ |
308,771 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Business
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation ("ROIC"), is a fully integrated and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"). ROIC specializes in the acquisition, ownership and management of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the west coast of the United States anchored by supermarkets and drugstores. ROIC refers to the properties it targets for investments as its target assets.
ROIC is organized in a traditional umbrella partnership real estate investment trust ("UpREIT") format pursuant to which Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiary, serves as the general partner of, and ROIC conducts substantially all of its business through, its operating partnership subsidiary, Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), together with its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references to the “Company”, “we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company” refer to ROIC together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.
With the approval of its stockholders, ROIC reincorporated as a Maryland corporation on June 2, 2011. ROIC began operations as a Delaware corporation, known as NRDC Acquisition Corp., which was incorporated on July 10, 2007, for the purpose of acquiring assets or operating businesses through a merger, capital stock exchange, stock purchase, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with one or more assets or control of one or more operating businesses. On October 20, 2009, ROIC’s stockholders and warrantholders approved each of the proposals presented at the special meetings of stockholders and warrantholders, respectively, in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Framework Agreement (the "Framework Agreement") ROIC entered into on August 7, 2009 with NRDC Capital Management, LLC, which, among other things, sets forth the steps to be taken by ROIC to continue its business as a corporation that has elected to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010.
ROIC’s only material asset is its ownership of direct or indirect partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and membership interest in Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As a result, ROIC does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the parent company and issuing equity from time to time. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and directly or indirectly holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from warrant exercises and equity issuances by ROIC, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s incurrence of indebtedness (directly and through subsidiaries) or through the issuance of operating partnership units (“OP Units”) of the Operating Partnership.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), requiring companies to present information about reclassifications out of AOCI in one place and by component. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2012. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statement disclosures. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned or controlled by the Company. Entities which the Company does not control through its voting interest and entities which are variable interest entities ("VIEs"), but where it is not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The Company follows the FASB guidance for determining whether an entity is a VIE and requires the performance of a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.
A non-controlling interest in a consolidated subsidiary is defined as the portion of the equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Non-controlling interests are required to be presented as a separate component of equity in the consolidated balance sheet and modifies the presentation of net income by requiring earnings and other comprehensive income to be attributed to controlling and non-controlling interests.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods covered by the financial statements. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the purchase price allocations, depreciable lives, revenue recognition and the collectability of tenant receivables and other receivables, the valuation of performance-based restricted stock, stock options, and derivatives. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Federal Income Taxes
Commencing with ROIC’s taxable year ended December 31, 2010, ROIC has elected to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"). Under those sections, a REIT that, among other things, distributes at least 90% of REIT taxable income and meets certain other qualifications prescribed by the Code will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income that is distributed.
Although it may qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, ROIC is subject to state income or franchise taxes in certain states in which some of its properties are located. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through the Company's taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") is fully subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For all periods from inception through September 26, 2013 the Operating Partnership has been an entity disregarded from its sole owner, ROIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and as such has not been subject to federal income taxes. Effective September 27, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued 3,290,263 OP Units in connection with the acquisitions of Crossroads Shopping Center and Five Points Plaza, which are described under Note 2 below. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership ceased being a disregarded entity and instead is being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
The Company follows the FASB guidance that defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The FASB also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company records interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as interest expense. As of September 30, 2013, the tax years 2010 through and including 2012 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and state taxing authorities. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the IRS conducted an examination of the Company's 2009 federal tax return. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company reached a settlement with the IRS in which the Company paid to the IRS approximately $122,000.
Real Estate Investments
All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs and improvements that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred. The Company expenses transaction costs associated with business combinations in the period incurred. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, capitalized costs related to the improvements or replacement of real estate properties were approximately $14.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases and acquired in-place leases). Acquired lease intangible assets include above-market leases and acquired in-place leases in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management's determination of the relative fair values of these assets. In valuing an acquired property's intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs. Leasing commissions, legal and other related costs ("lease origination costs") are classified as deferred charges in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The value of in-place leases is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates, over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received and management's estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of acquisition. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company's experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The value of the above-market and below-market leases associated with the original lease term is amortized to rental income, over the terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense, and the above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income, over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases. If the value of below-market leases includes renewal option periods, the Company includes such renewal periods in the amortization period utilized. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time. The Company may record a bargain purchase gain if it determines that the purchase price for the acquired assets was less than the fair value. The Company will record a liability in situations where any part of the cash consideration is deferred. The amounts payable in the future are discounted to their present value. The liability is subsequently re-measured to fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. If, up to one year from the acquisition date, information regarding fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate property adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation on a retrospective basis.
In conjunction with the Company's pursuit and acquisition of real estate investments, the Company expensed acquisition transaction costs during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 of approximately $641,000 and $194,000, respectively, and approximately $1.6 million and $947,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Regarding the Company's 2013 property acquisitions (see Note 2), the fair value of in-place leases and other intangibles have been allocated to intangible asset and liability accounts. Such allocations are preliminary and may be adjusted as final information becomes available.
Asset Impairment
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to aggregate future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed the fair value. Management does not believe that the value of any of the Company's real estate investments was impaired at September 30, 2013.
In June 2013, the Company sold the Nimbus Winery Shopping Center, a non-grocery anchored, non-core shopping center located in Rancho Cordova, California. The sales price of this property of approximately $6.3 million, less costs to sell, resulted in proceeds to the Company of approximately $5.6 million. Accordingly, the Company recorded a loss on sale of property of approximately $714,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which has been included in discontinued operations.
The Company reviewed its investment in its unconsolidated joint venture for impairment periodically and the Company would record an impairment charge when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than temporary. The ultimate realization of the Company's investment in its unconsolidated joint venture was dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no remaining unconsolidated joint ventures.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed the federally insured limit by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances.
Restricted Cash
The terms of several of the Company's mortgage loans payable require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such "restricted cash" is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established and is not available to fund other property-level or Company-level obligations.
Revenue Recognition
Management has determined that all of the Company's leases with its various tenants are operating leases. Rental income is generally recognized based on the terms of leases entered into with tenants. In those instances in which the Company funds tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be owned by the Company, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant. When the Company determines that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, the Company commences revenue recognition and lease incentive amortization when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. Minimum rental income from leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Percentage rent is recognized when a specific tenant's sales breakpoint is achieved. Property operating expense recoveries from tenants of common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other recoverable costs are recognized in the period the related expenses are incurred. Lease incentives are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the respective tenant lease terms.
Termination fees (included in rental revenue) are fees that the Company has agreed to accept in consideration for permitting certain tenants to terminate their lease prior to the contractual expiration date. The Company recognizes termination fees in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, "Revenue Recognition," when the following conditions are met: (a) the termination agreement is executed; (b) the termination fee is determinable; (c) all landlord services pursuant to the terminated lease have been rendered; and (d) collectivity of the termination fee is assured. Interest income is recognized as it is earned. Gains or losses on disposition of properties are recorded when the criteria for recognizing such gains or losses under generally accepted accounting principles have been met.
The Company must make estimates as to the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rent, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and other revenues. Management analyzes accounts receivable and the allowance for bad debts by considering tenant creditworthiness, current economic trends, and changes in tenants' payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. The Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses of the deferred straight-line rents receivable. The provision for doubtful accounts at both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was approximately $3.2 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
The Company uses the straight-line method for depreciation and amortization. Buildings are depreciated over the estimated useful lives which the Company estimates to be 39-40 years. Property improvements are depreciated over the estimated useful lives that range from 10 to 20 years. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over the estimated useful lives that range from 3 to 10 years. Tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the related leases or their useful life.
Deferred Charges
Deferred charges consist principally of leasing commissions and acquired lease origination costs (which are amortized ratably over the life of the tenant leases) and financing fees (which are amortized over the term of the related debt obligation). Deferred charges in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are shown at cost, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $13.0 million and $9.1 million, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and tenant receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants and requires tenants to provide security deposits.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") excludes the impact of dilutive shares and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock and then shared in the earnings of the Company.
During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the effect of the 41,400,000 warrants to purchase ROIC’s common stock (the "Public Warrants") issued in connection with ROIC’s initial public offering (the "IPO") and the 8,000,000 warrants (the "Private Placement Warrants") purchased by NRDC Capital Management, LLC (the "Sponsor") simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, for the time these were outstanding during these periods, were included in the calculation of diluted EPS as the weighted average share price was greater than the exercise price during these periods. See Note 6 below.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, basic EPS was determined by dividing net income allocable to common stockholders for the applicable period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such period. Net income during the applicable period is also allocated to the time-based unvested restricted stock as these grants are entitled to receive dividends and are therefore considered a participating security. Time-based unvested restricted stock is not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income; such amounts are allocated entirely to the common stockholders other than the holders of time-based unvested restricted stock. The performance-based restricted stock awards outstanding under the 2009 Plan described in Note 7 are excluded from the basic EPS calculation, as these units are not participating securities until they vest.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation between basic and diluted EPS for ROIC:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ROIC
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Less, earnings allocated to unvested shares
|
|
|
(20,736 |
) |
|
|
(70,280 |
) |
|
|
(57,623 |
) |
|
|
(165,949 |
) |
Net income available for common shareholders, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
25,241,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,548,488 |
|
|
$ |
29,965,566 |
|
|
$ |
8,004,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic EPS – weighted average common shares
|
|
|
72,025,017 |
|
|
|
51,440,751 |
|
|
|
65,810,620 |
|
|
|
50,483,251 |
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,318,662 |
|
|
|
1,823,756 |
|
|
|
2,827,612 |
|
|
|
609,877 |
|
OP Units
|
|
|
143,055 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,209 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted stock awards – performance-based
|
|
|
134,402 |
|
|
|
126,697 |
|
|
|
123,661 |
|
|
|
125,071 |
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
59,094 |
|
|
|
54,634 |
|
|
|
61,263 |
|
|
|
47,512 |
|
Denominator for diluted EPS – weighted average common equivalent shares
|
|
|
73,680,230 |
|
|
|
53,445,838 |
|
|
|
68,871,365 |
|
|
|
51,265,711 |
|
Earnings Per Unit
The following table sets forth the reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per unit for the Operating Partnership:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Operating Partnership
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Less, earnings allocated to unvested units
|
|
|
(20,736 |
) |
|
|
(70,280 |
) |
|
|
(57,623 |
) |
|
|
(165,949 |
) |
Net income available for unitholders, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
25,241,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,548,488 |
|
|
$ |
29,965,566 |
|
|
$ |
8,004,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per unit – weighted average units
|
|
|
72,168,072 |
|
|
|
51,440,751 |
|
|
|
65,858,829 |
|
|
|
50,483,251 |
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,318,662 |
|
|
|
1,823,756 |
|
|
|
2,827,612 |
|
|
|
609,877 |
|
Restricted stock awards – performance-based
|
|
|
134,402 |
|
|
|
126,697 |
|
|
|
123,661 |
|
|
|
125,071 |
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
59,094 |
|
|
|
54,634 |
|
|
|
61,263 |
|
|
|
47,512 |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit – weighted average units
|
|
|
73,680,230 |
|
|
|
53,445,838 |
|
|
|
68,871,365 |
|
|
|
51,265,711 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is more fully described in Note 7.
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans based on the FASB guidance which requires that compensation expense be recognized based on the fair value of the stock awards less estimated forfeitures. Restricted stock grants vest based upon the completion of a service period ("time-based grants") and/or the Company meeting certain established financial performance criteria ("performance-based grants"). Time-based grants are valued according to the market price for ROIC’s common stock at the date of grant. For performance-based grants, the Company generally engages an independent appraisal company to determine the value of the shares at the date of grant, taking into account the underlying contingency risks associated with the performance criteria. It is the Company's policy to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing market price of stock on the grant date or the date immediately prior to the grant date. Awards of stock options and time-based grants stock are expensed as compensation ratably over the vesting period. Awards of performance-based grants are expensed as compensation under an accelerated method and are recognized in income regardless of the Company results against the performance criteria.
Derivatives
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge.
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in one industry segment, ownership of commercial real estate properties. The Company does not distinguish in property operations for purposes of measuring performance. The Company reassesses its conclusion that it has one reportable operating segment at least annually.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation.
2.
|
Real Estate Investments
|
The following real estate investment transactions have occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Property Acquisitions
On February 1, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Diamond Bar Town Center located in Diamond Bar, California, within the Los Angeles metropolitan area, for a purchase price of approximately $27.4 million. Diamond Bar Town Center is approximately 100,000 square feet and is anchored by a national grocer. The property was acquired with borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On February 6, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Bernardo Heights Plaza in Rancho Bernardo, California, within the San Diego metropolitan area, for a purchase price of approximately $12.4 million. Bernardo Heights Plaza is approximately 38,000 square feet and is anchored by Sprouts Farmers Market and Tuesday Morning. The property was acquired with cash of approximately $3.6 million and the assumption of an existing mortgage with a principal amount of approximately $8.9 million, and a fair value of approximately $9.7 million.
On April 15, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Canyon Crossing Shopping Center located in Puyallup, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan area, for a purchase price of approximately $35.0 million. Canyon Crossing Shopping Center is approximately 121,000 square feet and is anchored by Safeway Supermarket. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On April 22, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Diamond Hills Plaza located in Diamond Bar, California, within the Los Angeles metropolitan area, for a purchase price of approximately $48.0 million. Diamond Hills Plaza is approximately 140,000 square feet and is anchored by an H Mart Supermarket and a Rite Aid. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On June 27, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Hawthorne Crossings located in San Diego, California, for a purchase price of approximately $41.5 million. Hawthorne Crossings is approximately 141,000 square feet and is anchored by Mitsuwa Supermarket, Ross Dress For Less and Staples. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On June 27, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Granada Shopping Center located in Livermore, California, for a purchase price of approximately $17.5 million. Granada Shopping Center is approximately 69,000 square feet and is anchored by SaveMart (Lucky) Supermarket. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On August 23, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Robinwood Shopping Center located in West Linn, Oregon, for a purchase price of approximately $14.2 million. Robinwood Shopping Center is approximately 71,000 square feet and is anchored by Walmart Neighborhood Market. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On September 18, 2013, the Company acquired a parcel of land adjacent to one of its properties located in Pomona, California, for a purchase price of approximately $700,000. The parcel of land was acquired using available cash on hand.
Acquisitions of Entities
On September 27, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 51% of the partnership interests in the Terranomics Crossroads Associates, LP from its joint venture partner. The purchase of the remaining interest was funded through the issuance of 2,639,632 OP Units with a fair value of approximately $36.4 million and the assumption of a $49.6 million mortgage loan on the property. Prior to the acquisition date, the Company accounted for its 49% interest in the Terranomics Crossroad Associates, LP as an equity method investment. The acquisition-date fair value of the previous equity interest was $36.0 million and is included in the measurement of the consideration transferred. The Company recognized a gain of $20.4 million as a result of remeasuring its prior equity interest in the venture held before the acquisition. The gain is included in the line item Gain on consolidation of joint venture in the consolidated income statement. The primary asset of Terranomics Crossroads Associates is Crossroads Shopping Center located in Bellevue, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan area. Crossroads Shopping Center is approximately 464,000 square feet and is anchored by Kroger (QFC) Supermarket, Sports Authority and Bed Bath and Beyond.
On September 27, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in SARM Five Points Plaza, LLC for an adjusted purchase price of approximately $52.6 million. The primary asset of SARM Five Points Plaza, LLC is Five Points Plaza located in Huntington Beach, California. Five Points Plaza is approximately 161,000 square feet and is anchored by Trader Joes, Old Navy and Pier 1. The purchase of the membership interests was funded through approximately $43.6 million in cash using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility (of which approximately $17.2 million was used by the seller to pay off the existing financing) and the issuance of 650,631 OP Units with a fair value of approximately $9.0 million.
The financial information set forth below summarizes the Company's preliminary purchase price allocation for the properties and entities acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
92,737,353 |
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
287,160,030 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
552,213 |
|
Acquired lease intangible asset
|
|
|
12,645,524 |
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
4,718,347 |
|
Tenant receivables and other assets
|
|
|
1,132,232 |
|
Assets acquired
|
|
$ |
398,945,699 |
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired lease intangible liability
|
|
|
6,444,176 |
|
Mortgage notes assumed
|
|
|
62,749,675 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
4,282,450 |
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
$ |
73,476,301 |
|
The Company assessed the fair value of the lease intangibles based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount rates and available market information. Such inputs are Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for a discussion of the framework for measuring fair value.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The pro forma financial information set forth below is based upon the Company's historical consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, adjusted to give effect of these transactions as if they had been completed at the beginning of 2012.
The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of each year, nor does it purport to represent the results of future operations.
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
31,583,264 |
|
|
$ |
29,649,795 |
|
|
$ |
94,490,509 |
|
|
$ |
91,581,332 |
|
Property operating and other (income) and expenses
|
|
|
(4,322,845 |
) |
|
|
14,576,943 |
|
|
|
31,298,109 |
|
|
|
43,355,811 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,801,778 |
|
|
|
10,459,503 |
|
|
|
32,730,036 |
|
|
|
33,045,275 |
|
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
$ |
25,104,331 |
|
|
$ |
4,613,349 |
|
|
$ |
30,462,364 |
|
|
$ |
15,180,246 |
|
The following table summarizes the operating results included in the Company's historical consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, for the properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
3,704,067 |
|
|
$ |
6,267,584 |
|
Property operating and other expenses
|
|
|
1,562,393 |
|
|
|
2,798,255 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,709,838 |
|
|
|
2,970,022 |
|
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
$ |
431,836 |
|
|
$ |
499,307 |
|
The following table summarizes the operating results included in the Company's historical consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, for the properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
2,404,248 |
|
|
$ |
4,714,303 |
|
Property operating and other expenses
|
|
|
711,904 |
|
|
|
2,117,411 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
876,498 |
|
|
|
1,680,821 |
|
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
|
|
$ |
815,846 |
|
|
$ |
916,071 |
|
Mortgage Notes Receivable
The Company held a $10.0 million second mortgage loan and funded a $294,000 partner loan to the joint venture that owned the Crossroads Shopping Center. On September 27, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining interest in Crossroads Shopping Center. Accordingly, both loans were extinguished upon consolidation of the joint venture during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
At December 31, 2012, investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture consisted of a 49% ownership in Terranomics Crossroads Associates, LP of $15.3 million. On September 27, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining interests in Terranomics Crossroads Associates, LP from its joint venture partner. The purchase of its remaining interest was funded through the issuance of 2,639,632 OP units with a fair value of approximately $36.4 million and the assumption of a $49.6 million mortgage loan on the property. Upon the acquisition of the remaining interest in the property, the Company reclassified approximately $16.0 million from “Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures” to “Real estate investments” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The acquisition-date fair value of the previous equity interest was $36.0 and is included in the measurement of the consideration transferred. The Company recognized a gain of $20.4 million as a result of remeasuring its prior equity interest in the venture held before the acquisition. The gain is included in the line item Gain on consolidation of joint venture in the consolidated income statement.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no remaining unconsolidated joint ventures.
3.
|
Discontinued Operations
|
On June 5, 2013, the Company sold the Nimbus Winery Shopping Center, a non-grocery anchored, non-core shopping center located in Rancho Cordova, California. The sales price of this property of approximately $6.3 million, less costs to sell, resulted in proceeds to the Company of approximately $5.6 million. Accordingly, the Company recorded a loss on sale of property of approximately $714,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which has been included in discontinued operations. The carrying value of the property as of December 31, 2012 was approximately $6.3 million.
4.
|
Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facilities
|
ROIC does not hold any indebtedness. All debt is held directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership, however, ROIC has guaranteed the Operating Partnership’s revolving credit facility, term loan, and carve-out guarantees on property-level debt.
Mortgage Notes Payable
The mortgage notes payable collateralized by respective properties and assignment of leases at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gateway Village I
|
|
February 2014
|
|
|
5.58% |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,718,119 |
|
Gateway Village II
|
|
May 2014
|
|
|
5.73% |
|
|
|
6,755,688 |
|
|
|
6,872,265 |
|
Euclid Plaza
|
|
November 2014
|
|
|
5.23% |
|
|
|
8,199,219 |
|
|
|
8,329,824 |
|
Country Club Gate
|
|
January 2015
|
|
|
5.04% |
|
|
|
12,298,360 |
|
|
|
12,477,997 |
|
Renaissance Towne Centre
|
|
June 2015
|
|
|
5.13% |
|
|
|
16,559,352 |
|
|
|
16,760,383 |
|
Crossroads Shopping Center
|
|
September 2015
|
|
|
6.50% |
|
|
|
49,613,818 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gateway Village III
|
|
July 2016
|
|
|
6.10% |
|
|
|
7,392,459 |
|
|
|
7,460,907 |
|
Bernardo Heights
|
|
July 2017
|
|
|
5.70% |
|
|
|
8,787,673 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Santa Teresa Village
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
6.20% |
|
|
|
11,081,533 |
|
|
|
11,223,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120,688,102 |
|
|
$ |
69,843,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,222,540 |
|
|
|
2,846,459 |
|
Total mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,910,642 |
|
|
$ |
72,689,842 |
|
On September 3, 2013, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance on the Gateway Village I mortgage note payable, without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note.
Credit Facilities
The Operating Partnership has a revolving credit facility (the "credit facility") with several banks. Previously, the credit facility provided for borrowings of up to $200.0 million. Effective September 26, 2013, the Company entered into a third amendment to the amended and restated credit agreement (the "credit agreement amendment") pursuant to which the borrowing capacity was increased to $350.0 million. Additionally, the credit facility contains an accordion feature, which was amended to allow the Operating Partnership to increase the facility amount up to an aggregate of $700.0 million, subject to lender consents and other conditions. The maturity date of the credit facility has been extended to September 26, 2017, subject to a further one-year extension option, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
The Operating Partnership has a term loan agreement (the “term loan”) with several banks. The term loan provides for a loan of $200.0 million and contains an accordion feature, which allows the Operating Partnership to increase the facility amount up to an aggregate of $300.0 million subject to commitments and other conditions. The maturity date of the term loan is August 29, 2017.
The Company obtained investment grade credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service (Baa2) and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (BBB-) credit agencies during the second quarter of 2013. Prior to receiving such investment grade ratings, borrowings under the credit facility and term loan agreements (collectively, the “loan agreements”) accrued interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the consolidated leverage ratio of the Company and its subsidiaries, plus, as applicable, (i) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the cost of funds for dollar deposits for the relevant period (the "Eurodollar Rate"), or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank National Association as its "prime rate," and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% (the "Base Rate"). Effective as of June 26, 2013, and in connection with receiving the investment grade credit ratings from two rating agencies, borrowings under the loan agreements bear interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) the Eurodollar Rate, or (ii) the Base Rate. Prior to June 26, 2013, the Operating Partnership was obligated to pay an unused fee of (a) 0.35% of the undrawn balance if the total outstanding principal amount was less than 50% of the aggregate commitments or (b) 0.25% if the total outstanding principal amount was greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate commitments, and a fronting fee at a rate of 0.125% per year with respect to each letter of credit issued under the agreements. Subsequent to June 26, 2013, the Operating Partnership is obligated to pay a facility fee at a rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, and a fronting fee at a rate of 0.125% per year with respect to each letter of credit issued under the agreements. The agreements contain customary representations, financial and other covenants. The Operating Partnership’s ability to borrow under the loan agreements is subject to its compliance with financial covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis. The Operating Partnership was in compliance with such covenants at September 30, 2013.
As of September 30, 2013, $200.0 million and $174.8 million were outstanding under the term loan and credit facility, respectively. The average interest rates on both the term loan and the credit facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively. The Company had $175.2 million available to borrow under the credit facility at September 30, 2013. The Company had no available borrowings under the term loan.
5.
|
Preferred Stock of ROIC
|
ROIC is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the board of directors. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
6.
|
Common Stock and Warrants of ROIC
|
On June 23, 2011, ROIC entered into an ATM Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement ("sales agreement") with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated to sell shares of ROIC’s common stock par value $0.0001 per share, having aggregate sales proceeds of $50.0 million from time to time, through an "at the market" equity offering program under which Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated acts as sales (“agent”) and/or principal agent. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, ROIC did not sell any shares under the sales agreement. Through September 30, 2013, ROIC has sold a total of 3,183,245 shares under the sales agreement, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $39.3 million and commissions of approximately $687,600 paid to the agent.
Simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, the Sponsor purchased 8,000,000 Private Placement Warrants at a purchase price of $1.00 per warrant. The Private Placement Warrants were identical to the Public Warrants except that the Private Placement Warrants were exercisable on a cashless basis as long as they were still held by the Sponsor or its members, members of its members’ immediate family or their controlled affiliates. The purchase price of the Private Placement Warrants approximated the fair value of such warrants at the purchase date.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Sponsor exercised the outstanding 8,000,000 Private Placement Warrants on a cashless basis pursuant to which ROIC issued 688,500 shares to the Sponsor.
ROIC has the right to redeem all of the outstanding warrants it issued in the IPO, at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon 30 days' notice while the warrants are exercisable, only in the event that the last sale price of the common stock is at least a specified price. The terms of the warrants are as follows:
|
·
|
The exercise price of the warrants is $12.00.
|
|
·
|
The expiration date of the warrants is October 23, 2014.
|
|
·
|
The price at which ROIC’s common stock must trade before ROIC is able to redeem the warrants it issued in the IPO is $18.75.
|
|
·
|
To provide that a warrantholder's ability to exercise warrants is limited to ensure that such holder's "Beneficial Ownership" or "Constructive Ownership," each as defined in ROIC’s charter, does not exceed the restrictions contained in the charter limiting the ownership of shares of ROIC’s common stock.
|
ROIC had reserved 53,400,000 shares for the exercise of the Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants, and issuance of shares under the ROIC’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2009 Plan"). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the third-party warrant holders exercised a total of 201,001 and 18,565,282 Public Warrants, respectively, resulting in a total of $2.4 million and $222.8 million of proceeds, respectively.
On July 31, 2013, the Company’s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to a maximum of $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock.
Warrant Repurchase
In May 2010, ROIC’s board of directors authorized a warrant repurchase program to repurchase up to a maximum of $40.0 million of ROIC’s warrants. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, ROIC repurchased 690,650 warrants under the program in open market transactions for approximately $1.3 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, ROIC repurchased an additional 11,484,000 warrants in privately negotiated transactions for approximately $22.0 million.
As of September 30, 2013, 10,659,068 of the 41,400,000 original Public Warrants remain outstanding and no Private Placement Warrants are outstanding.
7.
|
Stock Compensation for ROIC
|
ROIC follows the FASB guidance related to stock compensation which establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans, including all arrangements by which employees receive shares of stock or other equity instruments of the employer, or the employer incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price of the employer's stock. The guidance also defines a fair value-based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument.
In 2009, ROIC adopted the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan provides for grants of restricted common stock and stock option awards up to an aggregate of 7.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of ROIC’s common stock at the time of the award, subject to a ceiling of 4,000,000 shares.
Restricted Stock
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, ROIC awarded 224,500 shares of restricted common stock under the 2009 Plan, of which 86,250 shares are performance-based grants and the remainder of the shares are time-based grants. The performance-based grants vest in three equal annual tranches, based on pre-defined market-specific performance criteria with vesting dates on January 1, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
A summary of the status of ROIC's non-vested restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2013, and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
391,264 |
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
224,500 |
|
|
$ |
11.82 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(95,664) |
|
|
$ |
10.81 |
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2013
|
|
|
520,100 |
|
|
$ |
11.15 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the amounts charged to expenses for all stock-based compensation arrangements totaled approximately $763,000 and $972,000, respectively. The amounts charged to expenses for all stock-based compensation arrangements totaled approximately $2.1 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
8.
|
Capital of the Operating Partnership
|
As of September 30, 2013, the Operating Partnership had 75,352,848 OP Units outstanding. The Company owned 95.6% of the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding 72,062,585 shares of ROIC common stock and 3,290,263 Operating Partnership units (excluding Operating Partnership units owned by ROIC). A share of ROIC’s common stock and the Operating Partnership units have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and distributions of the Operating Partnership.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of the remaining interests in Crossroads Shopping Center from its joint venture partner, the Company issued a total of 2,639,632 OP Units to limited partners. Additionally, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of the membership interests in SARM Five Points Plaza, LLC, the Company issued a total of 650,631 OP Units to limited partners. Subject to certain exceptions, holders may redeem their OP Units, at the option of ROIC, for cash or for shares of ROIC common stock on a one-for-one basis. If cash is paid in the redemption, the redemption price is equal to the average closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market for shares of ROIC’s common stock over the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date a redemption notice is received by ROIC.
Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, ROIC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and as the parent company, ROIC has the full and complete authority over the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management and control. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, ROIC effectively controls the ability to issue common stock of ROIC upon redemption of any OP Units. The redemption provisions that permit ROIC to settle in either cash or common stock, at the option of ROIC, are further evaluated in accordance with applicable accounting guidance to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet is appropriate. The Company evaluated this guidance, including the requirement to settle in unregistered shares, and determined that the OP Units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity.
The redemption value of the OP Units owned by the limited partners, not including ROIC, had such units been redeemed at September 30, 2013, was approximately $45.5 million based on the average closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market of ROIC common stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding September 30, 2013, which amounted to $13.82 per share.
9.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
The Company follows the FASB guidance that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.
The guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management, using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies as discussed in Note 1. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts realizable upon disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant and other receivables, deposits, prepaid expenses, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying values of the credit facility and term loan are deemed to be at fair value since the outstanding debt is directly tied to monthly LIBOR contracts. Mortgage notes receivables were recorded at the actual purchase price. Mortgage notes payable were recorded at their fair value at the time they were assumed and are estimated to have a fair value of approximately $134.2 million with an interest rate range of 2.8% to 4.1% and the weighted average interest rate of 3.1% as of September 30, 2013. These fair value measurements fall within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative and Hedging Activities
The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The following is a summary of the terms of the Company’s interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
|
|
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
4/15/2011
|
|
4/15/2021
|
|
9/22/2014
|
PNC Bank, N.A.
|
|
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
|
7/1/2011
|
|
7/1/2018
|
|
12/1/2013
|
Bank of Montreal
|
|
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
|
4/2/2012
|
|
4/1/2019
|
|
12/1/2013
|
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
|
|
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
4/2/2012
|
|
4/2/2019
|
|
9/22/2014
|
Royal Bank of Canada
|
|
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
4/1/2013
|
|
4/3/2023
|
|
10/31/2014
|
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are being recorded in AOCI and will be subsequently reclassified into earnings during the period in which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.
The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, and implied volatilities. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective counterparty's non-performance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contract for the effect of non-performance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of September 30, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative position and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The table below presents the Company's liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets and
Liabilities (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,391,684 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,391,684 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(11,346,791 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(11,346,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(18,012,516 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(18,012,516 |
) |
Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest expense is recognized on the hedged debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $4.7 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively:
Derivatives designed as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013
Fair Value
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
Fair Value
|
|
Interest rate products
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$ |
1,391,684 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Interest rate products
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$ |
(11,346,791 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,012,516 |
) |
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
The table below details the location in the financial statements of the gain or loss recognized on interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and ineffectiveness are recognized as interest expense and amounts related to ineffectiveness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivative
|
|
$ |
(1,419,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,823,453 |
) |
|
$ |
4,642,590 |
|
|
$ |
(7,873,977 |
) |
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into interest
|
|
$ |
1,187,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,484 |
|
|
$ |
3,558,368 |
|
|
$ |
2,720,594 |
|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)
|
|
$ |
(1,259 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,807 |
) |
|
$ |
3,308 |
|
|
$ |
(10,511 |
) |
10.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of its properties. In management's opinion, the liabilities, if any, that ultimately may result from such legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
The following table represents the Company’s future minimum annual lease payments under operating leases as of September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
172,722 |
|
2014
|
|
|
690,888 |
|
2015
|
|
|
690,888 |
|
2016
|
|
|
754,910 |
|
2017
|
|
|
818,932 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
23,981,684 |
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
27,110,024 |
|
Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 51% of the partnership interests in the Terranomics Crossroads Associates, LP and the acquisition of 100% of the equity interest in SARM Five Points Plaza LLC (both more fully discussed in Note 2), the Company entered into Tax Protection Agreements with certain limited partners of our Operating Partnership. The Tax Protection Agreements require the Company, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of 12 years, to indemnify the Crossroads Sellers and Five Points Sellers receiving OP Units against certain tax liabilities incurred by them, as calculated pursuant to the applicable Tax Protection Agreement, if such liabilities result from a transaction involving a taxable disposition of Crossroads or Five Points Plaza, as applicable, or if the Operating Partnership fails to maintain and allocate to such holders for taxation purposes minimum levels of Operating Partnership liabilities as specified in the Tax Protection Agreement. The Company has no present intention to sell or otherwise dispose of the properties or interests therein in taxable transactions during the restriction period. If the Company were to trigger the tax protection provisions under these agreements, the Company would be required to pay damages in the amount of the taxes owed by these limited partners (plus additional damages in the amount of the taxes incurred as a result of such payment).
11.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
The Company has entered into several lease agreements with an officer of the Company, whereby pursuant to the lease agreements, the Company is provided the use of storage space. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $8,200 and $2,400, respectively, of expenses relating to the agreements. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $19,500 and $7,200, respectively, of expenses relating to the agreements. These expenses were included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In determining subsequent events, the Company reviewed all activity from October 1, 2013 to the date the financial statements are issued and discloses the following items:
On October 15, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Peninsula Marketplace located in Huntington Beach, California, for a purchase price of approximately $35.9 million. Peninsula Marketplace is approximately 95,000 square feet and is anchored by Kroger (Ralphs) Supermarket and CVS Pharmacy. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On October 16, 2013, the Company repurchased 4,350,000 warrants in a privately negotiated transaction for a total of approximately $9.4 million. Following the transaction, 6,254,868 of the 41,400,000 original Public Warrants and none of the Private Placement Warrants remain outstanding.
On October 17, 2013, the Company received notices of redemption for 158,221 OP Units. The Company elected to redeem the OP Units in cash, and accordingly, a total of $2.2 million was paid on October 31, 2013 to the holders of the respective OP Units. In accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, the redemption value was calculated based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of receipt of the notices of redemption.
On October 30, 2013, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.15 per share, payable on December 30, 2013 to holders of record on December 16, 2013.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words "believes," "anticipates," "projects," "should," "estimates," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and in Section 21F of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Actual results may differ materially due to uncertainties including:
|
·
|
our ability to identify and acquire retail real estate investments that meet our investment standards in our target markets;
|
|
·
|
the level of rental revenue and net interest income we achieve from our target assets;
|
|
·
|
the market value of our assets and the supply of, and demand for, retail real estate investments in which we invest;
|
|
·
|
the state of the U.S. economy generally, or in specific geographic regions;
|
|
·
|
the impact of economic conditions on our business;
|
|
·
|
the conditions in the local markets in which we operate and our concentration in those markets, as well as changes in national economic and market conditions;
|
|
·
|
consumer spending and confidence trends;
|
|
·
|
our ability to enter into new leases or to renew leases with existing tenants at the properties we own or acquire at favorable rates;
|
|
·
|
our ability to anticipate changes in consumer buying practices and the space needs of tenants;
|
|
·
|
the competitive landscape impacting the properties we own or acquire and their tenants;
|
|
·
|
our relationships with our tenants and their financial condition and liquidity;
|
|
·
|
our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax;
|
|
·
|
our use of debt as part of our financing strategy and our ability to make payments or to comply with any covenants under any borrowings or other debt facilities we currently have or subsequently obtain;
|
|
·
|
the level of our operating expenses, including amounts we are required to pay to our management team and to engage third party property managers;
|
|
·
|
changes in interest rates that could impact the market price of our common stock and the cost of our borrowings; and
|
|
·
|
legislative and regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs).
|
We caution that the foregoing list of factors is not all-inclusive. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. We caution not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We do not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
Overview
ROIC commenced operations in October 2009 as a fully integrated and self-managed REIT. ROIC specializes in the acquisition, ownership and management of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the west coast of the United States, anchored by supermarkets and drugstores. ROIC refers to the properties it targets for investment as its target assets.
From the commencement of its operations through September 30, 2013, the Company has completed approximately $1.2 billion of shopping center investments. As of September 30, 2013, the Company's portfolio consisted of 52 wholly-owned retail properties totaling approximately 5.6 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”).
As of September 30, 2013, the Company's portfolio was approximately 94.1% leased. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company leased or renewed a total of 164,000 square feet in its portfolio. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company leased or renewed a total of 417,000 square feet in its portfolio. The Company has committed approximately $2.1 million and $470,000 in tenant improvements and leasing commissions, respectively, for the new leases and renewals that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
ROIC is organized in a traditional umbrella partnership real estate investment trust ("UpREIT") format pursuant to which Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, its subsidiary, serves as the general partner of, and ROIC conducts substantially all of its business through, its wholly-owned Operating Partnership, Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and its subsidiaries. ROIC reincorporated as a Maryland corporation on June 2, 2011. ROIC has elected to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the year ended December 31, 2010.
Subsequent Events
In determining subsequent events, the Company reviewed all activity from October 1, 2013 to the date the financial statements are issued and discloses the following items:
On October 15, 2013, the Company acquired the property known as Peninsula Marketplace located in Huntington Beach, California, for a purchase price of approximately $35.9 million. Peninsula Marketplace is approximately 95,000 square feet and is anchored by Kroger (Ralphs) Supermarket and CVS Pharmacy. The property was acquired using borrowings under the Company’s credit facility.
On October 16, 2013, the Company repurchased 4,350,000 warrants in a privately negotiated transaction for a total of approximately $9.4 million. Following the transaction, 6,254,868 of the 41,400,000 original Public Warrants and none of the Private Placement Warrants remain outstanding.
On October 17, 2013, the Company received notices of redemption for 158,221 OP Units. The Company elected to redeem the OP Units in cash, and accordingly, a total of $2.2 million was paid on October 31, 2013 to the holders of the respective OP Units. In accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, the redemption value was calculated based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of receipt of the notices of redemption.
On October 30, 2013, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.15 per share, payable on December 30, 2013 to holders of record on December 16, 2013.
Report on Operating Results
Funds from operations ("FFO"), is a widely-recognized non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that the Company believes when considered with financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to assess its financial performance. FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate the performance of REITs, most of which present FFO along with net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The Company computes FFO in accordance with the "White Paper" on FFO published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), which defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains or losses from debt restructuring, sales of depreciable property, and impairments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for partnerships and unconsolidated joint ventures.
However, FFO:
|
·
|
does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income); and
|
|
·
|
should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance.
|
FFO as defined by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled items reported by other REITs due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance relating to business combinations requires, among other things, an acquirer of a business (or investment property) to expense all acquisition costs related to the acquisition, the amount of which will vary based on each specific acquisition and the volume of acquisitions. Accordingly, the costs of completed acquisitions will reduce our FFO. Acquisition costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $641,000 and $194,000, respectively. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $1.6 million and $947,000, respectively.
The Company may acquire the remaining interests from its joint venture partners it does not already own. At that time, a gain or loss may be recorded, in accordance with GAAP, based on the Company’s determination of the fair value of the properties at the time of the purchase of the remaining interests in the properties. Accordingly, the amount of the gain or loss will increase or decrease, respectively, our FFO. During the three and nine months ended both September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company acquired the remaining interests from certain of its joint venture partners. The gains recorded upon consolidation of joint ventures for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $20.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
The Company makes real estate-related debt investments where the primary focus is to capitalize on opportunities to acquire control positions that will enable the Company to obtain the underlying property should a default occur. The Company’s bargain purchase gains are primarily associated with these types of investments. Accordingly, the amount of the gain will increase our FFO. The Company recognized a bargain purchase gain of approximately $3.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company did not recognize a bargain purchase gain during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013, or during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
The table below provides a reconciliation of net income applicable to common stockholders in accordance with GAAP to FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for period
|
|
$ |
25,262,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,618,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,023,189 |
|
|
$ |
8,170,504 |
|
Plus: Real property depreciation
|
|
|
5,099,480 |
|
|
|
3,358,925 |
|
|
|
14,016,786 |
|
|
|
9,637,979 |
|
Amortization of tenant improvements and allowances
|
|
|
1,280,784 |
|
|
|
964,039 |
|
|
|
3,668,635 |
|
|
|
2,824,173 |
|
Amortization of deferred leasing costs
|
|
|
3,375,057 |
|
|
|
2,747,593 |
|
|
|
10,127,736 |
|
|
|
8,275,765 |
|
Depreciation and amortization attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
354,431 |
|
|
|
513,285 |
|
|
|
1,059,761 |
|
|
|
1,725,522 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
713,529 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$ |
35,372,043 |
|
|
$ |
10,202,610 |
|
|
$ |
59,609,636 |
|
|
$ |
30,633,943 |
|
Results of Operations
At September 30, 2013, the Company had 52 properties, all of which are consolidated (“consolidated properties”) in the accompanying financial statements. The Company believes, because of the location of the properties in densely populated areas, the nature of its investments provides for relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times. The Company has a strong capital structure with manageable debt. The Company expects to continue to actively explore acquisition opportunities consistent with its business strategy.
Property operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. The Company defines property operating income as operating revenues (base rent and recoveries from tenants), less property and related expenses (property operating expenses and property taxes). Property operating income excludes general and administrative expenses, mortgage interest income, depreciation and amortization, acquisition transaction costs, interest expense, gains and losses from property acquisitions and dispositions, equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures, extraordinary items, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating property operating income, and accordingly, the Company’s property operating income may not be comparable to other REITs.
Property operating income is used by management to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties, to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of the Company’s properties as this measure is not affected by the cost of our funding, the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses, gains or losses from the acquisition and sale of operating real estate assets, general and administrative expenses or other gains and losses that relate to our ownership of our properties. The Company believes the exclusion of these items from net income is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating the Company’s properties as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.
Property operating income is a measure of the operating performance of the Company’s properties but does not measure the Company’s performance as a whole. Property operating income is therefore not a substitute for net income or operating income as computed in accordance with GAAP.
Results of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Property Operating Income
The table below provides a reconciliation of consolidated operating income, in accordance with GAAP, to consolidated property operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income per GAAP
|
|
$ |
6,465,308 |
|
|
$ |
3,070,365 |
|
Plus: |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,755,321 |
|
|
|
7,070,557 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,526,312 |
|
|
|
3,699,852 |
|
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
641,224 |
|
|
|
194,191 |
|
Less: |
Mortgage interest |
|
|
(204,961 |
) |
|
|
(189,995 |
) |
Property operating income
|
|
$ |
19,183,204 |
|
|
$ |
13,844,970 |
|
The following comparison for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012, makes reference to the effect of the same-store properties. Same-store properties represent all operating properties owned by the Company in the same manner during both periods which totaled 35 of the Company’s 52 consolidated properties.
The table below provides a reconciliation of operating income in accordance with GAAP to property operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 related to the 35 same-store properties owned by the Company during the entirety of both periods.
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store operating income per GAAP
|
|
$ |
7,277,283 |
|
|
$ |
6,403,817 |
|
Plus:
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,322,541 |
|
|
|
6,686,279 |
|
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
Same-store property operating income
|
|
$ |
13,600,108 |
|
|
$ |
13,095,607 |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company generated property operating income of approximately $19.2 million compared to property operating income of $13.8 million generated during the three months ended September 30, 2012. Property operating income increased by $5.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2013 compared to 2012 and an increase in same-store properties’ operating income. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 52 consolidated properties as compared to 39 properties at September 30, 2012. The newly acquired properties increased property operating income in 2013 by approximately $4.8 million. The 35 same-store properties increased property operating income by approximately $505,000.
Depreciation and amortization
The Company incurred depreciation and amortization expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $9.8 million compared to $7.1 million incurred during the comparable period in 2012. Depreciation and amortization expenses were higher in 2013 as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2013 compared to 2012.
General and administrative Expenses
The Company incurred general and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $2.5 million compared to $3.7 million incurred during the comparable period in 2012. General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $1.2 million primarily as a result of approximately $1.0 million incurred in 2012 related to moving the Company’s corporate headquarters from White Plains, New York to San Diego, California, for which there were no comparable expenses in the current year.
Acquisition transaction costs
The Company incurred property acquisition costs during the three months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $641,000 compared to $194,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2012. Property acquisition costs were higher in 2013 due to additional legal and other professional fees incurred related to acquisition activity.
Interest expense and other finance expenses
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $3.7 million of interest expense compared to approximately $3.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was due to higher net borrowings on the term loan/credit facility and interest incurred on loans assumed for Santa Teresa Village and Bernardo Heights, slightly offset by lower borrowing costs during the period.
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining partnership interests in the Crossroads Shopping Center from its joint venture partner. The Company recorded a gain of approximately $20.4 million when determining the fair value of the property at the time of the purchase of the remaining interest in the property. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company acquired the remaining partnership interests in Wilsonville Old Town Square from its joint venture partner. The Company recorded a gain of approximately $2.1 million when determining the fair value of the property at the time of the purchase of the remaining interest in the property.
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint venture
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $2.1 million compared to $0.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of approximately $1.6 million was primarily due to the recognition of the earned preferred return of approximately $2.0 million on the Company’s initial 49% investment in the Crossroads Shopping Center in connection with the acquisition of the remaining partnership interests during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for which there was no comparable preferred return in the prior year. This increase was offset by the reduction in regular earnings from our partnership interests in Wilsonville Old Town Square that were consolidated on August 1, 2012. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no remaining unconsolidated joint ventures.
Results of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Property Operating Income
The table below provides a reconciliation of consolidated operating income, in accordance with GAAP, to consolidated property operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income per GAAP
|
|
$ |
18,937,587 |
|
|
$ |
8,814,130 |
|
Plus:
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27,813,157 |
|
|
|
20,737,917 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,175,994 |
|
|
|
8,716,378 |
|
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
1,569,592 |
|
|
|
947,404 |
|
Less:
|
Mortgage interest
|
|
|
(617,217 |
) |
|
|
(901,645 |
) |
Property operating income
|
|
$ |
55,879,113 |
|
|
$ |
38,314,184 |
|
The following comparison for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, makes reference to the effect of the same-store properties. Same-store properties represent all operating properties owned by the Company in the same manner during both periods which totaled 29 of the Company’s 52 consolidated properties.
The table below provides a reconciliation of operating income in accordance with GAAP to property operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 related to the 29 same-store properties owned by the Company during the entirety of both periods.
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store operating income per GAAP
|
|
$ |
18,782,575 |
|
|
$ |
15,745,256 |
|
Plus:
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,227,381 |
|
|
|
18,356,774 |
|
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
53,771 |
|
Same-store property operating income
|
|
$ |
35,011,980 |
|
|
$ |
34,155,801 |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company generated property operating income of approximately $55.9 million compared to property operating income of $38.3 million generated during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Property operating income increased by $17.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2013 compared to 2012 and an increase in same-store properties’ operating income. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 52 consolidated properties as compared to 39 properties at September 30, 2012. The newly acquired properties increased property operating income in 2013 by approximately $16.7 million. The 29 same-store properties increased property operating income by approximately $856,000.
Depreciation and amortization
The Company incurred depreciation and amortization expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $27.8 million compared to $20.7 million incurred during the comparable period in 2012. Depreciation and amortization expenses were higher in 2013 as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2013 compared to 2012.
General and administrative Expenses
The Company incurred general and administrative expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $8.2 million compared to $8.7 million incurred during the comparable period in 2012. General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $540,000 primarily as a result of $1.0 million incurred in 2012 related to moving the Company’s corporate operations from White Plains, New York to San Diego, California, for which there was no comparable expenses in the current year, offset by increased administrative expenses incurred to support our increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2013 compared to 2012.
Acquisition transaction costs
The Company incurred property acquisition costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $1.6 million compared to $947,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2012. Property acquisition costs were higher in 2013 due to legal and other professional fees incurred related to acquisition activity.
Interest expense and other finance expenses
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $11.0 million of interest expense compared to approximately $8.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to higher net borrowings on the term loan/credit facility and interest incurred on loans assumed for Santa Teresa Village, Euclid Plaza and Bernardo Heights, slightly offset by lower borrowing costs during the period.
Gain on consolidation of joint venture
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining partnership interests in the Terranomics Crossroads Associates from its joint venture partner and recorded a gain of approximately $20.4 million when determining the fair value of the property at the time of the purchase of the remaining interest in the property. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company acquired the remaining partnership interests in Wilsonville Old Town Square from its joint venture partner and recorded a gain of approximately $2.1 million when determining the fair value of the property at the time of the purchase of the remaining interest in the property.
Gain on bargain purchase
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded a gain on bargain purchase of approximately $3.9 million when recording the fair values of two properties that were acquired during the period through Conveyance in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreements. There was no comparable gain recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint venture
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint venture of approximately $2.4 million compared to $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of approximately $0.9 million was primarily due to the recognition of the earned preferred return of approximately $2.0 million on the Company’s initial 49% investment in the Crossroads Shopping Center in connection with the acquisition of the remaining partnership interests during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for which there was no comparable preferred return in the prior year. This increase was offset by the reduction in regular earnings from our partnership interests in Wilsonville Old Town Square that were consolidated on August 1, 2012. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no remaining unconsolidated joint ventures.
Loss from discontinued operations
In June 2013, the Company sold the Nimbus Winery Shopping Center, a non-grocery anchored, non-core shopping center located in Rancho Cordova, California. The sales price of this property of approximately $6.3 million, less costs to sell, resulted in proceeds to the Company of approximately $5.6 million. Accordingly, the Company recorded a loss on sale of property of approximately $714,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which has been included in discontinued operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of the Company's accounting policies included in Note 1 to ROIC’s and the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records base rents on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in tenant and other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Most leases contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse a pro-rata share of real estate taxes and certain common area expenses. Adjustments are also made throughout the year to tenant and other receivables and the related cost recovery income based upon the Company's best estimate of the final amounts to be billed and collected. In addition, the Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses in connection with the deferred straight-line rent receivable.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is established based on a quarterly analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers information such as the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history of the tenants or other debtors, the financial condition of the tenants and any guarantors and management's assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related negotiations, among other things. Management's estimates of the required allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on tenants, particularly those at retail properties. Estimates are used to establish reimbursements from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate tax and insurance costs. The Company analyzes the balance of its estimated accounts receivable for real estate taxes, common area maintenance and insurance for each of its properties by comparing actual recoveries versus actual expenses and any actual write-offs. Based on its analysis, the Company may record an additional amount in its allowance for doubtful accounts related to these items. In addition, the Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses in connection with the deferred straight-line rent receivable.
Real Estate
Land, buildings, property improvements, furniture/fixtures and tenant improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Renovations and/or replacements, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases and acquired in-place leases). The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management's determination of the relative fair values of these assets. In valuing an acquired property's intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.
The value of in-place leases is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates, over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received and management's estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of acquisition. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company's experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The value of the above-market and below-market leases associated with the original lease term is amortized to rental income, over the terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense, and the above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income, over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases. If the value of below-market leases includes renewal option periods, the Company includes such renewal periods in the amortization period utilized. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time. The Company will record a bargain purchase gain if it determines that the purchase price for the acquired assets was less than the fair value. The Company will record a liability in situations where any part of the cash consideration is deferred. The amounts payable in the future are discounted to their present value. The liability is subsequently re-measured to fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. If, up to one year from the acquisition date, information regarding fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate property adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation on a retrospective basis.
The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful life of its properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation. These assessments have a direct impact on its net income.
Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Buildings
|
39-40 years
|
Property Improvements
|
10-20 years
|
Furniture/Fixtures
|
3-10 years
|
Tenant Improvements
|
Shorter of lease term or their useful life
|
Asset Impairment
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to aggregate future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair value. Management does not believe that the value of any of the Company's real estate investments was impaired at September 30, 2013.
The Company reviews its investment in its unconsolidated joint venture for impairment periodically and the Company would record an impairment charge when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than temporary. The ultimate realization of the Company's investment in its unconsolidated joint ventures is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has no remaining unconsolidated joint ventures.
REIT Qualification Requirements
ROIC has elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, and believes that it has been organized and has operated in a manner that will allow it to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code.
ROIC is subject to a number of operational and organizational requirements to qualify and then maintain qualification as a REIT. If ROIC does not qualify as a REIT, its income would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates that would be substantial and the Company cannot re-elect to qualify as a REIT for four taxable years following the year that it failed to qualify as a REIT. The resulting adverse effects on the Company's results of operations, liquidity and amounts distributable to stockholders would be material.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company
In this "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company" section and in the "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership" section, the term "the Company" refers to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. on an unconsolidated basis, excluding the Operating Partnership.
The Company's business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership, of which the Company is the parent company and which it consolidates for financial reporting purposes. Because the Company operates on a consolidated basis with the Operating Partnership, the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership” should be read in conjunction with this section to understand the liquidity and capital resources of the Company on a consolidated basis and how the Company is operated as a whole.
The Company issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company. The Company itself does not hold any indebtedness other than guarantees of indebtedness of the Operating Partnership, and its only material assets are its ownership of direct or indirect partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and membership interest in Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the consolidated assets and liabilities and the consolidated revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. However, all debt is held directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership. The Company’s principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common stock. The Company's principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.
As the parent company of the Operating Partnership, the Company, indirectly, has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management and control. The Company causes the Operating Partnership to distribute such portion of its available cash as the Company may in its discretion determine, in the manner provided in the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement.
The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with an effective shelf registration statement filed in June 2013 that allows the Company to register unspecified various classes of equity securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue equity from time to time on an opportunistic basis, dependent upon market conditions and available pricing. Any proceeds from such equity issuances would be contributed to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership may use the proceeds to acquire additional properties and for general working capital purposes.
Liquidity is a measure of the ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain its assets and operations, make distributions to its stockholders and meet other general business needs. The liquidity of the Company is dependent on the Operating Partnership’s ability to make sufficient distributions to the Company. The primary cash requirement of the Company is its payment of dividends to its stockholders.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company's primary source of cash was proceeds from the exercise of warrants. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has determined that it has adequate working capital to meet its debt obligations and operating expenses for the next twelve months.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into an ATM Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement ("sales agreement") with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated to sell shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, having aggregate sales proceeds of $50.0 million from time to time, through an "at the market" equity offering program under which Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated acts as sales agent and/or principal (“agent”). During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company did not sell any shares under the sales agreement.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, dividends paid to stockholders totaled approximately $31.6 million. On a consolidated basis, cash flows from operations for the same period totaled approximately $32.9 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, dividends paid to stockholders totaled approximately $19.7 million. On a consolidated basis, cash flows from operations for the same period totaled approximately $19.2 million. The deficiency of $0.5 million was funded through a borrowing by the Operating Partnership under the credit facility. In the future, it is expected that the cash flows from stabilized properties will be sufficient to cover the dividends paid to stockholders.
Potential future sources of capital include equity financings, and if the value of its common stock continues to exceed the exercise price of its warrants, proceeds from the exercise of warrants from time to time. The Company obtained investment grade credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service (Baa2) and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (BBB-) credit agencies during the second quarter of 2013. These ratings provide the Company, through its Operating Partnership, access to the unsecured bond market, an additional avenue that can be used to fund the Company’s and the Operating Partnership's liquidity and capital needs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership
In this “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership” section, the terms the “Operating Partnership,” “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Operating Partnership together with its consolidated subsidiaries or the Operating Partnership and the Company together with their respective consolidated subsidiaries, as the context requires.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Operating Partnership's primary sources of cash were (i) cash flows from operating activities, (ii) proceeds from bank borrowings and (iii) proceeds from warrant exercises. As of September 30, 2013, the Operating Partnership has determined that it has adequate working capital to meet its debt obligations and operating expenses for the next twelve months.
The Operating Partnership has a revolving credit facility (the “credit facility”) with several banks. Previously, the credit facility provided for borrowings of up to $200.0 million. Effective September 26, 2013, the Company entered into a third amendment to the amended and restated credit agreement (the "credit agreement amendment") pursuant to which the borrowing capacity was increased to $350.0 million. Additionally, the credit facility contains an accordion feature, which was amended to allow the Operating Partnership to increase the facility amount up to an aggregate of $700.0 million subject to lender consents and other conditions. The maturity date of the credit facility has been extended to September 26, 2017, subject to a further one-year extension option, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
In addition, the Operating Partnership has a term loan agreement (the “term loan”) with several banks. The term loan provides for a loan of $200.0 million and contains an accordion feature, which allows the Operating Partnership to increase the facility amount up to an aggregate of $300.0 million subject to commitments and other conditions. The maturity date of the term loan is August 29, 2017.
The agreements contain customary representations, financial and other covenants. The Operating Partnership’s ability to borrow under the credit facility is subject to its compliance with financial covenants and other restrictions. The Operating Partnership was in compliance with such covenants at September 30, 2013.
As of September 30, 2013, $200.0 million and $174.8 million were outstanding under the term loan and credit facility, respectively. The average interest rates on both the term loan and credit facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively. The Company had $175.2 million available to borrow under the credit facility at September 30, 2013. The Company had no available borrowings under the term loan.
Prior to receiving such investment grade ratings described above, borrowings under the credit facility and term loan agreements accrued interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the consolidated leverage ratio of the Company and its subsidiaries, plus, as applicable, (i) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the cost of funds for dollar deposits for the relevant period (the "Eurodollar Rate"), or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank National Association as its "prime rate," and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% (the "Base Rate").
Subsequent to receiving the credit grade ratings, borrowings under the loan agreements bear interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) the Eurodollar Rate, or (ii) the Base Rate. In addition, prior to receipt of such credit ratings, the Operating Partnership was obligated to pay an unused fee of (a) 0.35% of the undrawn balance if the total outstanding principal amount was less than 50% of the aggregate commitments or (b) 0.25% if the total outstanding principal amount was greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate commitments, and a fronting fee at a rate of 0.125% per year with respect to each letter of credit issued under the agreements. Subsequent to receipt of the ratings, the Operating Partnership is obligated to pay a facility fee at a facility fee rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, and a fronting fee at a rate of 0.125% per year with respect to each letter of credit issued under the agreements.
In February 2013, the Operating Partnership assumed an existing mortgage loan with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $8.9 million as part of the acquisition of Bernardo Heights Plaza. Additionally, in September 2013, the Operating Partnership assumed an existing mortgage loan with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $49.6 million in connection with the acquisition of the remaining interests in Crossroads Shopping Center.
On September 3, 2013, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance on the Gateway Village I mortgage note payable, without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note.
While the Operating Partnership generally intends to hold its target assets as long term investments, certain of its investments may be sold in order to manage the Operating Partnership’s interest rate risk and liquidity needs, meet other operating objectives and adapt to market conditions. The timing and impact of future sales of its investments, if any, cannot be predicted with any certainty.
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$ |
33,343,629 |
|
|
$ |
19,196,544 |
|
Investing Activities
|
|
$ |
(239,857,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(126,103,241 |
) |
Financing Activities
|
|
$ |
211,655,804 |
|
|
$ |
96,077,932 |
|
Net Cash Flows from:
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities amounted to $33.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $19.2 million in the comparable period in 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, cash flows from operating activities increased by approximately $14.1 million primarily due to a $17.6 million increase in property operating income, offset by an increase in interest expense of approximately $2.8 million and an increase in acquisition transaction costs of approximately $0.6 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities amounted to $239.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $126.1 million in the comparable period in 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, cash flows used in investing activities increased by approximately $113.8 million, primarily due to the increase in investments in real estate and acquisition of entities, net of proceeds from the sale of real estate, of approximately $92.1 million, and an increase in improvements to properties of approximately $9.2 million and the return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures recorded in 2012 for which there was no activity in the current year.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows provided by financing activities amounted to $211.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $96.1 million in the comparable period in 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, cash flows provided by financing activities increased by approximately $115.6 million, primarily due to the receipt of $222.8 million of proceeds from the exercise of warrants. This increase was offset by an increase in net payments on the credit facility of approximately $34.3 million, payments made to acquire warrants of approximately $23.3 million, an increase in dividends paid to shareholders of approximately $11.8 million, and approximately $36.9 million in proceeds received during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 related to the sale of common stock under the ATM program, for which no activity occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents the principal amount of the Company's long-term debt maturing each year, including amortization of principal based on debt outstanding and other contractual obligations at September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable Principal (1)
|
|
$ |
525,988 |
|
|
$ |
16,715,283 |
|
|
$ |
77,267,004 |
|
|
$ |
7,582,838 |
|
|
$ |
8,460,412 |
|
|
$ |
10,136,577 |
|
|
$ |
120,688,102 |
|
Mortgage Notes Payable Interest
|
|
|
1,792,586 |
|
|
|
6,839,926 |
|
|
|
4,164,812 |
|
|
|
1,317,579 |
|
|
|
910,889 |
|
|
|
104,635 |
|
|
|
15,130,427 |
|
Term loan (2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200,000,000 |
|
Credit facility (2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
174,750,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
174,750,000 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
172,722 |
|
|
|
690,888 |
|
|
|
690,888 |
|
|
|
754,910 |
|
|
|
818,932 |
|
|
|
23,981,684 |
|
|
|
27,110,024 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,491,296 |
|
|
$ |
24,246,097 |
|
|
$ |
82,122,704 |
|
|
$ |
9,655,327 |
|
|
$ |
384,940,233 |
|
|
$ |
34,222,896 |
|
|
$ |
537,678,553 |
|
____________________
(1)
|
Does not include unamortized mortgage premium of $6.2 million as of September 30, 2013.
|
(2)
|
For the purpose of the above table, the Company has assumed that borrowings under the loan agreements bear interest at the average interest rate on the term loan and credit facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 which was 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively. Borrowings under the term loan and credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable (i) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the cost of funds for dollar deposits for the relevant period, or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank, National Association at its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%.
|
As of September 30, 2013, the Company did not have any capital lease obligations or purchase obligations.
The Company has entered into several lease agreements with an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the lease agreements, the Company is provided the use of storage space.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company's investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is an off-balance sheet investment. This unconsolidated joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control the operating and financial decisions of this investment. The Company's off-balance sheet arrangements are more fully discussed in Note 2, "Real Estate Investments," in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2013, the Company no longer has any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Real Estate Taxes
The Company’s leases generally require the tenants to be responsible for a pro rata portion of the real estate taxes.
Inflation
The Company's long-term leases contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on its operating results. Such provisions include clauses entitling the Company to receive (a) scheduled base rent increases and (b) percentage rents based upon tenants' gross sales which generally increase as prices rise. In addition, many of the Company's non-anchor leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits the Company to seek increases in rents upon renewal at then-current market rates if rents provided in the expiring leases are below then-existing market rates. Most of the Company's leases require tenants to pay a share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing the Company's exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Leverage Policies
The Company employs prudent amounts of leverage and uses debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of its properties and the diversification of its portfolio. The Company seeks to primarily utilize unsecured debt in order to maintain liquidity and flexibility in its capital structure.
The Operating Partnership has a revolving credit facility (the “credit facility”) with several banks. Previously, the credit facility provided for borrowings of up to $200.0 million. Effective September 26, 2013, the Company entered into a third amendment to the amended and restated credit agreement (the "credit agreement amendment") pursuant to which the borrowing capacity was increased to $350.0 million. Additionally, the credit facility contains an accordion feature, which was amended to allow the Operating Partnership to increase the facility amount up to an aggregate of $700.0 million subject to lender consents and other conditions. The maturity date of the credit facility has been extended to September 26, 2017, subject to a further one-year extension option, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
The Company may borrow on a non-recourse basis or at the corporate level or operating partnership level. Non-recourse indebtedness means the indebtedness of the borrower or its subsidiaries is secured only by specific assets without recourse to other assets of the borrower or any of its subsidiaries. Even with non-recourse indebtedness, however, a borrower or its subsidiaries will likely be required to guarantee against certain breaches of representations and warranties such as those relating to the absence of fraud, misappropriation, misapplication of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations. Because non-recourse financing generally restricts the lender's claim on the assets of the borrower, the lender generally may only proceed against the asset securing the debt. This may protect the Company's other assets.
The Company plans to evaluate each investment opportunity and determine the appropriate leverage on a case-by-case basis and also on a Company-wide basis. The Company may seek to refinance indebtedness, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase the investment.
The Company plans to finance future acquisitions of its target assets through a combination of cash, borrowings under its credit facilities, the assumption of existing mortgage debt in connection with the future acquisition of properties, and equity and debt offerings. In addition, the Company may acquire retail property indirectly through joint ventures with third parties as a means of increasing the funds available for the acquisition of properties.
Distributions
The Company intends to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of its common stock and operating units. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. The Company intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders in an amount not less than its net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by its board of directors. If the Company's cash available for distribution is less than its net taxable income, the Company could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or the Company may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities.
The Operating Partnership pays distributions to ROIC as a holder of units of the Operating Partnership.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company's primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates related to its debt. There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Company's future financing requirements.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company had $374.8 million of variable rate debt outstanding. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has primarily used fixed-rate debt and five forward starting interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. See the discussion under Note 9, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for certain quantitative details related to the interest rate swaps.
The Company entered into five forward starting interest rate swaps in order to economically hedge against the risk of rising interest rates that would affect the Company's interest expense related to its future anticipated debt issuances as part of its overall borrowing program. The sensitivity analysis table presented below shows the estimated instantaneous parallel shift in the yield curve up and down by 50 and 100 basis points, respectively, on the clean market value of its interest rate derivatives as of September 30, 2013, exclusive of non-performance risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase 100 basis
points
|
|
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
(4,506,091 |
) |
|
|
(3,521,317 |
) |
|
|
(2,564,107 |
) |
|
|
(1,641,384 |
) |
|
|
(754,088 |
) |
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
(6,439,166 |
) |
|
|
(5,243,477 |
) |
|
|
(4,124,263 |
) |
|
|
(2,949,118 |
) |
|
|
(1,804,384 |
) |
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
(6,762,462 |
) |
|
|
(5,398,846 |
) |
|
|
(4,094,432 |
) |
|
|
(2,744,876 |
) |
|
|
(1,434,999 |
) |
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
(2,043,663 |
) |
|
|
(1,374,359 |
) |
|
|
(739,267 |
) |
|
|
(82,154 |
) |
|
|
555,452 |
|
$ |
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
(759,321 |
) |
|
|
351,724 |
|
|
|
1,382,329 |
|
|
|
2,401,949 |
|
|
|
3,371,909 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures (Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)
ROIC’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based on their evaluation of the ROIC's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the ROIC's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurances to the timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to ROIC that would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there was no change in ROIC’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ROIC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures (Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)
The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based on their evaluation of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurances to the timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Operating Partnership that would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there was no change in the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation pending or threatened against us, other than routine litigation arising out of the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance and not expected to harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no significant changes to our risk factors during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, ROIC purchased outstanding Public Warrants as follows:
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
per Share
|
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
|
|
July 1, 2013 to July 31, 2013
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
August 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013
|
|
|
342,900 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
September 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013
|
|
|
347,750 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
|
|
|
690,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
3.1
|
Articles of Merger between Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Delaware corporation, and Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation, as survivor .(1) .
|
3.2
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Retail Opportunity Investment Corp.(1)
|
3.3
|
Bylaws of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.(2)
|
3.3
|
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP dated as of September 27, 2013 between Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC and Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.(3)
|
4.1
|
Specimen Unit Certificate.(2)
|
4.2
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(2)
|
4.3
|
Specimen Warrant Certificate.(2)
|
4.4
|
Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company NRDC Acquisition Corp.(4)
|
4.5
|
Supplement and Amendment to Warrant Agreement by and between NRDC Acquisition Corp. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, dated as of October 20, 2009.(2)
|
10.1
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the Borrower, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., as the Parent Guarantor, certain subsidiaries of the Parent Guarantor identified therein, as the Subsidiary Guarantors, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent and the other lenders party thereto.(3)
|
10.2
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Term Loan among Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the Borrower, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., as the Parent Guarantor, certain subsidiaries of the Parent Guarantor identified therein, as the Subsidiary Guarantors, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto.(3)
|
10.3
|
Contribution Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the sellers identified therein.(3)
|
10.4
|
Contribution Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the sellers identified therein.(3)
|
10.5
|
Tax Protection Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the protected partners identified therein.(3)
|
10.6
|
Tax Protection Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the protected partners identified therein.(3)
|
10.7
|
Registration Rights Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein.(3)
|
10.8
|
Registration Rights Agreement among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein.(3)
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2011.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2009.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2013.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1/A filed on September 7, 2007 (File No. 333-144871).
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
|
|
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS
PARTNERSHIP, LP, by Retail Opportunity Investments
GP, LLC, its sole general partner
|
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz
|
|
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
Date: |
October 31, 2013
|
|
Date: |
October 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
Name: |
Name: Michael B. Haines
|
|
Name: |
Name: Michael B. Haines
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: |
October 31, 2013 |
|
Date: |
October 31, 2013 |
exh_311.htm
EXHIBIT 31.1
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Stuart A. Tanz, certify that:
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Stuart A. Tanz, certify that:
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
exh_312.htm
EXHIBIT 31.2
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Michael B. Haines, certify that:
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Name: |
Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer
|
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Michael B. Haines, certify that:
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Name: |
Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer
|
exh_321.htm
EXHIBIT 32.1
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q"), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q"), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Name: |
Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp, the sole member of Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, the sole general partner of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP (the "Operating Partnership"), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q"), filed concurrently herewith by the Operating Partnership, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Name: |
Stuart A. Tanz |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer
|
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp, the sole member of Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, the sole general partner of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP (the "Operating Partnership"), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q"), filed concurrently herewith by the Operating Partnership, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
Date: October 31, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Name: |
Michael B. Haines |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Operating Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Operating Partnership filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Operating Partnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.